What This Article Covers:
This article provides you with an important overview of the initial legal process of filing and serving a personal injury lawsuit in state court, including:
- Covering how to establish jurisdiction over the defendants.
- How to ensure the case is filed in the correct court.
- Ways of choosing the most appropriate and convenient venue to have your case tried.
- Knowing the process and rules governing the proper and lawful service of your summons and complaint.
- How to avoid procedural errors that could delay or otherwise damage your case.
- Knowing when the discovery phase can technically commence and why this stage is crucial for accident victims to gather witness testimony and other forms of evidence that will support their legal claims.
Understanding the Legal Process – Filing and Serving a Personal Injury Lawsuit In State Court
A personal injury lawsuit is a complex and often lengthy process. Our legal system aims to ensure fairness and due process for all parties involved.
This article covers the beginning stages and progression of a typical personal injury case, which includes:
- The jurisdictional requirements of filing the case.
- The selection of an acceptable venue to file the case.
- The technical requirements of proving service of the complaint on the defendant.
We begin by summarizing how courts impose jurisdiction (control) over the civil defendant(s) who must appear before the court and defend themselves against the injured party’s (plaintiff} claims. And the role of the personal injury lawyer.
The Court’s Power to Impose Jurisdiction on Parties
Jurisdiction refers to the court’s power to hear a particular type of case and make legally binding rulings on the parties involved.
The specific rules and requirements of state court jurisdiction can vary by state, as each state has its own court system that governs its authority to hear and rule on different types of cases.
State Court Jurisdiction
The jurisdictional power of the state is limited to the state’s geographic territory. The two primary requirements for obtaining jurisdiction in state court include:
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
State courts can hear cases involving their state laws. Many states, such as California, have laws establishing monetary and jurisdictional thresholds for cases that can be heard in different levels of their state court system. This requirement is jurisdictional, referred to as the amount in controversy.
Personal Jurisdiction
State courts can exercise their authority over individuals and entities with sufficient physical presence or connections with the state, such as residents, businesses operating in the state, or those who commit acts within the state.
What if The Defendant Resides Outside the State?
Each state has a “long-arm” statute that specifies the circumstances under which a state court can impose personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
These statutes often extend to situations where the out-of-state defendant commits a negligent act or omission in the state where they are being sued or have sufficient legal contact with the state.
Example:
An Oregon resident, while driving through California, rear-ends a California driver, causing severe injuries. Even though the Oregon driver is not a California resident, the California state court can impose jurisdiction over the Oregon resident through its state’s long-arm statute.
The legal rationale for allowing the state to impose personal jurisdiction on out-of-state residents
- The Oregon driver benefitted from using California roads.
- The lawsuit arises from an accident that occurred in California.
- It is reasonable for California to exercise jurisdiction as the accident since the witnesses and evidence will be in California.
How Does Venue Work in Personal Injury Cases?
While jurisdiction determines a court’s power to hear a case and legally bind its parties, the venue issue determines the proper geographic location for the case.
In determining whether the venue is proper in a given case, courts carefully consider the following factors when ruling on motions to change venue, including:
Defendant’s place of residence:
The defendant’s residence is often the most significant factor. Personal Injury trials are expensive, and courts aim to avoid subjecting defendants to the burden and expense of defending themselves in distant locations.
Location where the injury was sustained:
The place where the injury occurred holds substantial weight. Witnesses, physical evidence, and other relevant information are often located at or near the accident scene, making it a logical and convincing venue choice.
Proximity to evidence:
The court will consider the location of documents, physical evidence, and other relevant materials in determining the venue. Choosing a venue where evidence is readily accessible can help reduce litigation costs for both parties.
Witness convenience:
Courts strive to minimize the time burden on witnesses, who may need to travel long distances within the state to testify. Choosing a venue convenient for witnesses helps ensure they remain cooperative and undistracted during the trial.
Avoiding unnecessary delay
A court can reassign cases to other courthouses if its caseload is too heavy. This allows the court system to operate more efficiently and with less delay.
Courts highly favor efficiency and the timely resolution of matters being tried within their court system.
Emotionally charged cases
In certain newsworthy cases, such as Trump’s civil cases, courts must consider the trial’s impact on the community and sometimes even the nation while also avoiding the potential effect of prejudicing the jury.
Courts are careful to avoid the possibility that the venue might unreasonably influence the composition of the jury pool, potentially affecting the trial’s outcome.
Differences Between Federal and State Courts in Determining Venue
- Federal courts often offer broader venue choices than state courts, particularly in federal cases where defendants reside in different states.
- Federal courts have more venue options, which can lead to judicial concerns about forum shopping—when a lawyer strategically chooses a venue they hope will be more favorable to their client’s case. Courts highly disfavor forum shopping.
How To Properly Serve a Summons and Complaint?
Before a defendant can be legally compelled to respond to a plaintiff’s civil complaint, the defendant must be lawfully served with a summons and complaint.
Should the process of service be later determined by the court to be legally defective, the case will be dismissed, leaving the plaintiff to begin the process all over again.
Service of process – State rules control
While the specific rules of civil procedure governing the legal requirements vary between states, the intent driving these rules are always identical: To afford the defendant fair and sufficient notice that a legal proceeding has commenced against them and that the defendant is legally compelled to appear and respond to the plaintiff’s allegations.
Due-process requirements
The legal requirements of notice and the opportunity for the defendant to be heard are fundamental to our justice system. The plaintiff cannot legally compel a party to appear that has not been lawfully served.
What Are the Different Ways of Serving A Defendant?
The Three Lawful Ways to Serve A Defendant:
- Personal service
- Substituted service
- Service by publication.
What Is Personal Service?
Personal service means actual service was legally made
Personal service is made by hand delivery on the defendant and is the most reliable form of proving notice.
Once the person is identified as the person to be served, the papers can be either handed to the person or, if the person refuses to accept them, the complaint and summons can be dropped at the person’s feet.
What Is Substituted Service?
The law requires that substituted service be used only after the plaintiff can establish that diligent efforts to effect personal service have failed.
For example, if the defendant cannot be found at home or work, many states allow service to be made by simply leaving the summons and complaint with someone at the defendant’s home.
That person, however, must be legally competent to accept service.
The above legal requirement is usually fulfilled if the person resides at the house and is of the age of majority.
What Is Service by Publication?
Also known as constructive service
This method of legal service relies upon publishing the plaintiff’s notice of their civil action and naming the defendant in a newspaper of sufficient circulation.
The courts have strictly construed service of the complaint and summons by the process of newspaper publication.
This is one reason why many states require that the party seeking service by publication must first obtain the court’s approval and demonstrate they have acted with due diligence and that other service methods have failed.
Most states require that legal notice of the action be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the defendant’s geographical area.
What is a Summons?
Order to appear and answer
The summons usually accompanies the complaint upon service. In a personal injury case or any other type of civil case, the summons is a legal document, traditionally printed form, that notifies the defendant that a civil lawsuit has been filed against them and that the party must timely and legally respond to the complaint or risk being in default.
The summons usually contains:
- The case caption
- The name of the court
- The names of the parties
- A case docket number
What If the Defendant Fails to Respond to Being Served?
Defaulting carries serious consequences
Failure to respond to a lawful and correctly served summons and complaint, such as filing and serving a responsive pleading, such as an answer or demurrer, will allow the plaintiff to request the court enter a default judgment against the defendant.
However, before the court enters the default, the plaintiff must demonstrate that legal service was legally made upon the defendant, whether by personal service, substituted service, or publication.
The prove-up hearing
The plaintiff will then request that the court set up a noticed prove-up hearing, during which the plaintiff will submit unchallenged evidence substantiating liability and damages, which the court will then convert into a default judgment against the defendant.
Once the court has entered a default judgment and the plaintiff provides notice of the official entry of judgment, the plaintiff can legally enforce the judgment by, among other ways, attaching the defendant’s personal and real property assets, levying on the defendant’s bank accounts, and garnishing wages.
Defendant’s One Last Chance
The defendant still has the legal right to request the court to set aside the judgment upon a satisfactory showing that the defendant did not respond to the summons and complaint because of defective service or some other justifiable reason, such as excusable neglect or mistake.
Statistic: According to the National Center for State Courts, 97% of civil cases are resolved in state courts, highlighting the importance of understanding state jurisdiction rules.
When Does the Discovery Phase Commence in Personal Injury Cases?
The personal injury case timeline enters the discovery phase after the injured party successfully files and serves the lawsuit and the defense files its answer.
During the discovery phase, both parties will request and exchange critical documents, such as medical records, conduct depositions, and exchange written questions and answers called interrogatories.
Selecting Your Personal Injury Attorney
Finally, remember, selecting effective legal representation is not just advantageous—it is essential for ensuring that all procedures are correctly followed and that your rights are fully protected throughout the legal process.